首頁(yè) - 網(wǎng)校 - 萬(wàn)題庫(kù) - 美好明天 - 直播 - 導(dǎo)航

萬(wàn)題庫(kù):2017年12月CET-4仔細(xì)閱讀真題及答案(卷2)

“萬(wàn)題庫(kù):2017年12月CET-4仔細(xì)閱讀真題及答案(卷2)”由考試吧發(fā)布,更多關(guān)于2017年12月英語(yǔ)四六級(jí)答案、英語(yǔ)四六級(jí)考試真題,請(qǐng)?jiān)L問考試吧四六級(jí)考試網(wǎng)或微信搜索“萬(wàn)題庫(kù)英語(yǔ)四六級(jí)考試”。

  Passage TWO

  Questions 51 to 55 are based on the following passage.

  Female applicants to postdoctoral positions geosciences were nearly half as likely to receive excellent letters of recommendation, compared with their male counterparts. Christopher Intagliata reports.

  As in many other fields, gender bias is widespread in the sciences Men score higher starting salaries, have more mentoring(指導(dǎo)),and have better odds of being hired, Studies show they're also perceived as more competent than women in STEM (Science,Technology Engineering, and Mathematics)fields. And new research reveals that men are more likely to receive excellent of recommendation, too.

  "Say, you know, this is the best student I've ever had," says Kuheli Dutt, a social scientist and diversity officer at Columbia University's Lamont campus." Compare those excellent letters with a merely good letter: 'The candidate was productive, or intelligent, or a solid Scientist or something that's clearly solid praise,' but noting that singles out the candidate as exceptional or one of a kind ".

  Dutt and her colleagues studied more than 1200 letters of recommendation for postdoctoral positions in geoscience. They were all edited for gender and other identifying information, so Dutt and her team could assign then a score without knowing the gender of the student. They found that female applicants were only half as likely to get outstanding letters, compared with their male counterparts. That includes letters of recommendation from all over the world, and written by, yes, men hand women The findings are in the journal Nature Geoscience.

  Dutt says they were not able to evaluate the actual scientific qualifications of the applications using the data in the files. But she says the results still suggest women in geoscience are at a potential disadvantage from the very beginning of their careers starting with those less than out-standing letters of recommendation.

  We are not trying to assign blame or criticize anyone or call anyone consciously sexist. Rather, the point is to use the results of this study to open up meaningful dialogues on implicit gender bias, bi it at a departmental level or an institutional level or even a discipline level .Which may lead to some recommendations for the letter writers themselves.

  51.【題干】What do we learn about applications to postdoctoral positions in geosciences?

  【選項(xiàng)】

  A.There are many more men applying than women.

  B.Chancecs for women to get the positions are scarce.

  C.More males than females are likely to get outstanding letters of recommendation.

  D.Male applicants have more interest in these positions than their female counterparts.

  【答案】C

  【解析】

  下載四六級(jí)萬(wàn)題庫(kù)>>>       [觀看視頻解析>>]

  52.【題干】What do studies about men and women in scientific research show?

  【選項(xiàng)】

  A.Women engaged in postdoctoral work are quickly catching up

  B.Fewer women are applying for postdoctoral positions due to gender bias.

  C.Men are believed to be better able to excel in STEM disciplines.

  D.Women who are keenly interested in STEM fields are often exceptional.

  【答案】C

  【解析】

  下載四六級(jí)萬(wàn)題庫(kù)>>>       [觀看視頻解析>>]

  53.【題干】What do the studies find about the recommendation letters for women applicants?

  【選項(xiàng)】

  A.They are hardly ever supported by concrete examples.

  B.They contain nothing that distinguishes the applicants.

  C.They provide objective information without exaggeration.

  D.They are often filled with praise for exceptional applicants.

  【答案】B

  【解析】

  下載四六級(jí)萬(wàn)題庫(kù)>>>       [觀看視頻解析>>]

  54.【題干】What did Dutt and her colleagues do with the more than 1200 letters of recommendation?

  【選項(xiàng)】

  A.They asked unbiased scholars to evaluate them.

  B.They invited women professionals to edit them.

  C.They assigned them randomly to reviewers.

  D.They deleted all information about gender.

  【答案】D

  【解析】

  下載四六級(jí)萬(wàn)題庫(kù)>>>       [觀看視頻解析>>]

  55.【題干】What does Dutt aim to do with her study?

  【選項(xiàng)】

  A.Raise recommendation writers' awareness of gender bias in their letters.

  B.Open up fresh avenues for women post-doctors to join in research work.

  C.Alert women researchers to all types of gender bias in the STEM disciplines.

  D.Start a public discussion on how to raise women's status in academic circles.

  【答案】A

  【解析】

  下載四六級(jí)萬(wàn)題庫(kù)>>>       [觀看視頻解析>>]

掃描/長(zhǎng)按二維碼可獲取四六級(jí)真題答案
獲取2017四級(jí)真題答案
獲取2017六級(jí)真題答案
獲取四六級(jí)成績(jī)查詢
獲取2018一次通關(guān)技巧

四六級(jí)萬(wàn)題庫(kù)下載 | 微信搜索"萬(wàn)題庫(kù)英語(yǔ)四六級(jí)考試"

  相關(guān)推薦

  2017年12月英語(yǔ)四六級(jí)真題及答案解析熱點(diǎn)文章關(guān)注微信,對(duì)答案看解析!

  四六級(jí)評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)最新算分器英語(yǔ)四六級(jí)萬(wàn)題庫(kù)估分[手機(jī)題庫(kù)下載]

  2017年12月四六級(jí)成績(jī)查詢時(shí)間微信查分提醒四六級(jí)合格分?jǐn)?shù)線

0
收藏該文章
0
收藏該文章
文章搜索
萬(wàn)題庫(kù)小程序
萬(wàn)題庫(kù)小程序
·章節(jié)視頻 ·章節(jié)練習(xí)
·免費(fèi)真題 ·?荚囶}
微信掃碼,立即獲。
掃碼免費(fèi)使用
英語(yǔ)四級(jí)
共計(jì)423課時(shí)
講義已上傳
30206人在學(xué)
英語(yǔ)六級(jí)
共計(jì)313課時(shí)
講義已上傳
20312人在學(xué)
閱讀理解
共計(jì)687課時(shí)
講義已上傳
5277人在學(xué)
完形填空
共計(jì)369課時(shí)
講義已上傳
13161人在學(xué)
作文
共計(jì)581課時(shí)
講義已上傳
7187人在學(xué)
推薦使用萬(wàn)題庫(kù)APP學(xué)習(xí)
掃一掃,下載萬(wàn)題庫(kù)
手機(jī)學(xué)習(xí),復(fù)習(xí)效率提升50%!
版權(quán)聲明:如果英語(yǔ)四六級(jí)考試網(wǎng)所轉(zhuǎn)載內(nèi)容不慎侵犯了您的權(quán)益,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系800@exam8.com,我們將會(huì)及時(shí)處理。如轉(zhuǎn)載本英語(yǔ)四六級(jí)考試網(wǎng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)注明出處。
Copyright © 2004- 考試吧英語(yǔ)四六級(jí)考試網(wǎng) 出版物經(jīng)營(yíng)許可證新出發(fā)京批字第直170033號(hào) 
京ICP證060677 京ICP備05005269號(hào) 中國(guó)科學(xué)院研究生院權(quán)威支持(北京)
領(lǐng)
精選6套卷
學(xué)
8次直播課
大數(shù)據(jù)寶典
通關(guān)大法!